Piecing The Puzzle – Skill Acquisition in the Developing Athlete
- Ryan Vigneau
- Jun 24
- 4 min read
If you’ve ever built IKEA furniture or tackled a big LEGO project, you know that skipping steps or ignoring the instructions can turn into a frustrating mess. Sure, it feels faster in the moment — until you realize a few steps later that something doesn’t fit, and you’re tearing the whole thing apart to fix it. Building an elite athlete is no different.
Mistakes in early development may go unnoticed for a while. But once they show up, they can cost valuable time, confidence, and even opportunity. That’s why skill acquisition isn’t just about getting reps — it’s about getting the right reps, at the right time, with the right support.
Skill Isn’t Just Talent — It’s Trainable
Skill development is often misunderstood as a byproduct of natural talent. But in reality, it’s a trainable process involving neurological adaptation, movement repetition, contextual learning, and environmental exposure. Athletes don’t just need hours of practice — they need intentional, developmentally appropriate practice.
The Skill Acquisition Pyramid: Five Stages of Development
While many coaches rely on the traditional three-stage model (Cognitive, Associative, Autonomous), we can expand this to a more detailed five-phase framework:
1. Initiation
Exposure to a new skill
Requires modeling, clear instructions, and immediate feedback
Expect high error rates
2. Acquisition
Athlete begins to perform the movement with effort
Movement is inconsistent but slowly improves
Simple drills with feedback loops work best
3. Consolidation
Technique becomes more stable
Athlete begins to self-correct and adapt
Introduce variability and problem-solving tasks
4. Refinement
Skill is consistent, efficient, and adaptable to pressure
Performance can be optimized and corrected in real time
Coaching becomes focused on biomechanics and decision-making
5. Creative Variation
Rare and usually seen in elite performers
Athlete can innovate under pressure
Coach takes a facilitator/strategist role
Most athletes will never reach the “Creative” phase — and they don’t need to. For youth and developing athletes, the primary focus should be reinforcing movement fundamentals and progressing one stage at a time.
Sidebar: Why Michael Couldn’t Hit
📚 Why Michael Couldn’t Hit: And Other Tales of the Neurology of Sports by Dr. Harold L. Klawans
“Hitting is a visual-motor skill… and like all other skills, it has to be learned.”
At the height of his basketball career, Michael Jordan was the greatest athlete on the planet. But when he briefly retired from the NBA to play baseball, he struggled — despite intense effort and world-class athleticism.
As a child, Jordan had played baseball, but he shifted focus to basketball in his teens. His peers, meanwhile, were learning how to read spin, time deliveries, and build baseball-specific neural patterns. By the time Jordan returned to baseball, it was too late to develop those pathways. He was an elite fielder (thanks to visual-tracking skills from basketball), but his batting average in AA was just .202.
Eventually, he returned to basketball and dominated once again — proving that excellence follows where skill acquisition has been fully developed and refined.
Development Isn’t Linear — And That’s Okay
Coaches often expect progress to follow a straight upward line. In reality, it’s more like a messy graph: ups, downs, plateaus, and sudden breakthroughs. Rushing the process can result in long-term setbacks, poor movement patterns, or burnout.
Respect the Reps: Coaching Tips for Skill Development
✅ Teach fewer things, better
✅ Use task-specific constraints to promote learning
✅ Scale complexity as athletes progress
✅ Blend external and internal feedback appropriately
✅ Don’t over-coach; let athletes struggle (productively)
✅ Value progress over performance in the early stages
Research Snapshot: What Science Says About Youth Training
Olympic lifting & plyometrics are more effective than traditional resistance training for youth, when properly coached
→ Chaouachi et al., 2014
Balance + plyometric training improves sprint and shuttle performance more than plyometrics alone
→ Chaouachi et al., 2014
Core endurance training reduces injury risk and enhances performance in school-aged children
→ Brett et al., 2014
Interval-based aerobic training boosts VO₂ and MAV in prepubertal children
→ Baquet et al., 2010
The takeaway: foundational motor skills, not just conditioning or sport-specific drills, build long-term performance.
Final Word: Skill Is Built, Not Bought
Skill acquisition isn’t about shortcuts — it’s about process. Athletes who learn how to learn are the ones who succeed, adapt, and ultimately thrive at the highest levels. Coaches who create environments that embrace the process — and don’t rush it — are the ones building athletes for the long game.

📚References
Klawans, H. L. (1996). Why Michael Couldn’t Hit: And Other Tales of the Neurology of Sports. Henry Holt & Co.
Baquet, G. G. (2010). Continuous vs. interval aerobic training in 8- to 11-year-old children. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(5), 1381–1388.
Brett, A. H. (2014). Effects of a core conditioning intervention on tests of trunk muscular endurance in school-aged children. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28(7), 2063–2070.
Chaouachi, O. H. (2014). The combination of plyometric and balance training improves sprint and shuttle run performances more often than plyometric-only training with children. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28(2), 401–412.



Comments